Mormon Open Forum

Over at Snarkernacle, even after withdrawing my nomination and obtaining agreement I wouldn’t be in the final tally, I’ve been elected one of three stooges. After someone then snarked an inquiry if Snarkette was my wife, I added:

“No, but I knew her in college. That’s why well managed polygamy is heaven for men. At a minimum, a healthy heterosexual guy needs at least two women on opposite cycles in separate houses. If you have the means and schedule, four wives are ideal on staggered cycles such that you spend ovulation week with each.”

A nerve was hit as both Snarky comments were immediately taken down. Let’s go easy on Snarkette this week. With luck this is only PMS not CMS.

Steve EM

Ann says:

I have always wanted to say this on FMH, but haven’t, because I like it there, and I only think this way 80% of the time…

Women are irrelevent to the church. We are breeders. Our only purpose is to produce and raise righteous priesthood holders. We are only valued in our abilities as long as those talents are channeled to encourage the breeding of priesthood holders by our sisters.

Thank you. I feel better.

em says “Do you view the Family Proclamation as scripture? How do you feel about men presiding/women submitting? Is the main purpose of the Proclamation to discourage homosexuality? Is the Proclamation compatible with the theory of evolution?”